<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian of the Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s our universe. Thanks for stopping by.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Logan Fyreite</title>
		<link>http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan Fyreite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Kename,

I fly the Guardian in RR fleets as well as solo to support armor tanking mission runners.  However I also have Logistics V now and that makes a huge difference.  I do not have much experience fighting sleepers however the following fit is solid and battle tested quite a few times.  Works for Logistics skill IV and without Logi IV you should stay away from any logi cruiser.  Some would say the same without Logi V, but I am not quite that prejudicial.

800mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I
Amarr Navy Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane
Damage Control II
Amarr Navy Armor Thermic Hardener
Amarr Navy Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane

10MN Afterburner II
Conjunctive Radar ECCM Scanning Array I

4 x Large &#039;Solace&#039; I Remote Bulwark Reconstruction
2 x Large &#039;Regard&#039; I Power Projector

Medium Ancillary Current Router I
Medium Remote Repair Augmentor I


Light Armor Maintenance Bot I x5

That is a pretty pimped out version, you could most likely drop the ECCM for a mod of your choice, but it has 40k ehp, and is cap stable running the ab and all four reps as long as you have a buddy feeding you two power projectors in a dual Guardian setup. Logi V and you can drop one of the power projectors and add one more remote armor repair.

This fit is less expensive, but sacrifices 2k ehp.

800mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I
2 x Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Damage Control II
Amarr Navy Armor Thermic Hardener

10MN Afterburner II
[empty med slot]

4 x Large &#039;Solace&#039; I Remote Bulwark Reconstruction
2 x Large &#039;Regard&#039; I Power Projector

Medium Ancillary Current Router I
Medium Remote Repair Augmentor I


Light Armor Maintenance Bot I x5

Very low on CPU so you will likely have a hard time filling the last mid slot.

Another option is to go 1 x medium &#039;regard&#039; and 1 x large &#039;regard&#039; and drop the Medium ACR, you remain cap stable with another Guardian but can be a close one if neuted.

Good luck out there with the Guardian!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kename,</p>
<p>I fly the Guardian in RR fleets as well as solo to support armor tanking mission runners.  However I also have Logistics V now and that makes a huge difference.  I do not have much experience fighting sleepers however the following fit is solid and battle tested quite a few times.  Works for Logistics skill IV and without Logi IV you should stay away from any logi cruiser.  Some would say the same without Logi V, but I am not quite that prejudicial.</p>
<p>800mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I<br />
Amarr Navy Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane<br />
Damage Control II<br />
Amarr Navy Armor Thermic Hardener<br />
Amarr Navy Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane</p>
<p>10MN Afterburner II<br />
Conjunctive Radar ECCM Scanning Array I</p>
<p>4 x Large &#8216;Solace&#8217; I Remote Bulwark Reconstruction<br />
2 x Large &#8216;Regard&#8217; I Power Projector</p>
<p>Medium Ancillary Current Router I<br />
Medium Remote Repair Augmentor I</p>
<p>Light Armor Maintenance Bot I x5</p>
<p>That is a pretty pimped out version, you could most likely drop the ECCM for a mod of your choice, but it has 40k ehp, and is cap stable running the ab and all four reps as long as you have a buddy feeding you two power projectors in a dual Guardian setup. Logi V and you can drop one of the power projectors and add one more remote armor repair.</p>
<p>This fit is less expensive, but sacrifices 2k ehp.</p>
<p>800mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I<br />
2 x Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II<br />
Damage Control II<br />
Amarr Navy Armor Thermic Hardener</p>
<p>10MN Afterburner II<br />
[empty med slot]</p>
<p>4 x Large &#8216;Solace&#8217; I Remote Bulwark Reconstruction<br />
2 x Large &#8216;Regard&#8217; I Power Projector</p>
<p>Medium Ancillary Current Router I<br />
Medium Remote Repair Augmentor I</p>
<p>Light Armor Maintenance Bot I x5</p>
<p>Very low on CPU so you will likely have a hard time filling the last mid slot.</p>
<p>Another option is to go 1 x medium &#8216;regard&#8217; and 1 x large &#8216;regard&#8217; and drop the Medium ACR, you remain cap stable with another Guardian but can be a close one if neuted.</p>
<p>Good luck out there with the Guardian!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjharvey</title>
		<link>http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>pjharvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>If it turns out, as I suspect, that the Damnation&#039;s warfare links are not terribly needed in our small fleets, and the ship is mostly to make me look pretty and menacing in equal quantities, I&#039;ll be happy to jump in a twinned Guardian to be more effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it turns out, as I suspect, that the Damnation&#8217;s warfare links are not terribly needed in our small fleets, and the ship is mostly to make me look pretty and menacing in equal quantities, I&#8217;ll be happy to jump in a twinned Guardian to be more effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bel Amar</title>
		<link>http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Bel Amar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Have a look at some of the battleclinic fitouts.  A lot of them are really crap, but there are some good ones in there that will give you some ideas for starting points</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a look at some of the battleclinic fitouts.  A lot of them are really crap, but there are some good ones in there that will give you some ideas for starting points</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kename</title>
		<link>http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>kename</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Hey Thanks! I don&#039;t have a lot of experience with using a Guardian, and the fitting is one of those things that I&#039;m relying on others for advice. It&#039;s expensive to buy, fly and lose them. :s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Thanks! I don&#8217;t have a lot of experience with using a Guardian, and the fitting is one of those things that I&#8217;m relying on others for advice. It&#8217;s expensive to buy, fly and lose them. :s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bel Amar</title>
		<link>http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Bel Amar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eve.finkeworld.com/2009/11/08/guardian-of-the-week/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Sometimes people will put a best named tech 1 fit on their t2 ships, either for fitting, performance or financial reasons.  It doesn&#039;t always work, but depending on the ship it can be an option sometimes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes people will put a best named tech 1 fit on their t2 ships, either for fitting, performance or financial reasons.  It doesn&#8217;t always work, but depending on the ship it can be an option sometimes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
